The Graph (GRT) Blockchain Data Indexing: The Future of Decentralized Information Infrastructure
The Graph (GRT) Blockchain Data Indexing: The Future of Decentralized Information Infrastructure
Explore The Graph's revolutionary decentralized indexing protocol transforming how blockchain data is queried and accessed, powering thousands of dApps with GRT token economics and innovative subgraph technology.
Table of Contents
1. The Graph: Solving Blockchain's Data Accessibility Problem
The Graph has emerged as one of the most fundamentally important infrastructure projects in the blockchain ecosystem, solving a critical problem that most users never see but that developers struggle with constantly—how to efficiently query and retrieve data from blockchains. Often called the "Google of blockchains," The Graph provides decentralized indexing and querying services that make blockchain data accessible and usable for applications ranging from DeFi protocols to NFT marketplaces to analytics platforms.
The problem The Graph solves is profound yet often invisible to end users. Blockchains are designed as append-only ledgers optimized for writing new transactions and verifying their validity, not for reading historical data or answering complex queries. Imagine trying to find all transactions involving a specific Ethereum address, or calculating the total trading volume for a particular DeFi protocol over the past month. These seemingly simple queries require scanning through millions of blocks and processing gigabytes of data—a process that could take hours or days using blockchain nodes directly.
Before The Graph, developers had two unappealing options: build custom indexing infrastructure for each application (expensive, time-consuming, and requiring significant technical expertise), or rely on centralized services that violated blockchain's decentralization principles. The Graph's innovation was creating a decentralized protocol where independent operators called Indexers maintain specialized databases that organize blockchain data for efficient querying, while economic incentives ensure reliability and decentralization.
The protocol's impact has been extraordinary. Thousands of decentralized applications now depend on The Graph for their data infrastructure, including major projects like Uniswap, Aave, Curve, Decentraland, and countless others. The Graph processes billions of queries monthly, making it one of the most heavily used protocols in the entire blockchain ecosystem. This mission-critical role positions The Graph as essential infrastructure for Web3's continued growth and mainstream adoption.
What do you think determines whether infrastructure projects succeed in blockchain? Have you considered how applications actually access blockchain data?
1.1 The Technical Architecture: Subgraphs and Indexing
At the heart of The Graph's protocol are subgraphs—open APIs that define how blockchain data should be indexed and made queryable. A subgraph consists of a manifest describing which smart contracts to track, what events to capture, and how to organize this data for efficient retrieval. Developers create subgraphs for their specific applications or data needs, then deploy them to The Graph's decentralized network.
The subgraph creation process demonstrates The Graph's developer-friendly approach. Rather than requiring complex database administration or infrastructure management, developers write relatively simple schema definitions using GraphQL—a popular query language already familiar to many web developers. This schema describes what data entities exist, their relationships, and how they map to blockchain events and contract states.
Here's how the technical flow works in practice:
- Smart contract events are emitted on blockchain as transactions execute
- Indexers monitor these blockchains for events relevant to their deployed subgraphs
- Mapping functions transform raw blockchain data into organized, queryable entities
- Graph Node software processes mappings and stores results in PostgreSQL databases
- GraphQL endpoints expose indexed data for applications to query efficiently
- Curators signal quality by staking GRT on subgraphs they believe are valuable
The mapping functions represent the intelligent processing layer that transforms blockchain's transaction-oriented data into application-friendly formats. For example, a DeFi protocol's raw blockchain events might include "Transfer," "Swap," "Mint," and "Burn" events. The mapping function processes these events to maintain updated state about liquidity pools, user balances, historical prices, and trading volumes—exactly the information applications need to present to users.
1.2 The Decentralized Network Architecture
The Graph's decentralized network consists of multiple participant roles working together through economic incentives to provide reliable indexing and querying services. This multi-sided marketplace creates competition, redundancy, and censorship resistance that centralized alternatives cannot match.
The key network participants include:
- Indexers operate infrastructure to index blockchains and serve queries, earning query fees and indexing rewards
- Curators identify high-quality subgraphs worth indexing by staking GRT tokens as quality signals
- Delegators stake GRT with Indexers to earn rewards without running infrastructure themselves
- Developers create and deploy subgraphs defining what data should be indexed
- Consumers query subgraphs through applications, paying fees for data access
Indexers represent the protocol's workhorses, running sophisticated infrastructure that monitors blockchains, processes data according to subgraph specifications, and serves queries to applications. Operating as an Indexer requires significant technical capability and capital investment—high-performance servers, reliable networking, substantial GRT stake—creating professional infrastructure providers comparable to traditional cloud services but operating within decentralized protocols.
Curators play a crucial discovery and quality signaling role. By staking GRT on subgraphs they believe are valuable and accurate, Curators help Indexers decide which subgraphs deserve their limited resources. Successful curation earns a portion of query fees, creating economic incentives for finding valuable data sources before they become widely used. This market mechanism allows efficient resource allocation without central planning.
Has this been helpful so far in understanding The Graph's architecture? Can you see how economic incentives coordinate decentralized infrastructure?
2. GRT Token Economics and Network Incentives
The GRT token serves as The Graph's native cryptocurrency, functioning as the economic coordination mechanism that aligns incentives across all network participants. Understanding GRT's role and tokenomics reveals how The Graph achieves decentralization while maintaining service quality and reliability.
GRT fulfills several essential functions within the protocol. Indexers must stake substantial GRT as collateral, ensuring they have economic incentive to serve accurate data and maintain infrastructure reliability. Curators stake GRT on subgraphs to signal quality and earn curation shares. Delegators stake GRT with Indexers to participate in network rewards. Query fees are paid in GRT, creating direct revenue streams for infrastructure providers. This multi-dimensional utility makes GRT integral to protocol operation rather than merely speculative.
The total GRT supply follows a carefully designed inflation schedule. Initial supply was 10 billion tokens with inflation providing ongoing rewards for network participants. The inflation rate adjusts based on network activity and staking levels, aiming to balance incentivizing participation with controlling supply expansion. Currently, inflation provides the majority of Indexer rewards, though the protocol's long-term vision envisions query fees becoming the dominant revenue source as usage grows.
Token distribution reflects The Graph's origins and development:
- Community allocation of approximately 23% for ecosystem development and grants
- Core developers receiving roughly 23% with multi-year vesting schedules
- Investors allocated approximately 34% from various funding rounds with vesting
- The Graph Foundation holding roughly 20% for ecosystem support and operations
This distribution, while showing significant insider allocation from early development and funding, also dedicates substantial portions to community growth and long-term ecosystem development. The vesting schedules prevent sudden supply shocks while ensuring contributors remain aligned with long-term success.
2.1 Staking Mechanics and Reward Distribution
The Graph's staking system creates sophisticated economic incentives that balance competition, cooperation, and quality service delivery. The mechanics reward professional infrastructure operation while making network participation accessible to smaller token holders through delegation.
Indexers earn rewards from two primary sources—indexing rewards distributed from protocol inflation, and query fees paid by consumers accessing data. The allocation of indexing rewards depends on several factors including total stake, query volume served, and responsiveness to queries. This creates competition among Indexers to provide high-quality service while maintaining sufficient stake to earn their share of rewards.
The stake-based allocation mechanism includes important nuances:
- Minimum stake requirements ensure Indexers have meaningful economic commitment to honest operation
- Capacity constraints limit how much delegation each Indexer can accept based on their own stake
- Slashing conditions penalize misbehavior like serving incorrect data or excessive downtime
- Query fee rebates allow Indexers to compete on price while maintaining service quality
- Cooldown periods prevent rapid stake movement that could destabilize the network
Delegators earn rewards proportional to their stake minus a commission fee charged by their chosen Indexer. This creates a marketplace for delegation where Indexers compete to attract delegation through reputation, commission rates, and infrastructure quality. Delegators must evaluate trade-offs between higher rewards (lower commission) and better service reliability (established Indexers with proven track records).
The curation market operates through an innovative bonding curve mechanism. The first Curators to signal on a subgraph pay less GRT per curation share than later arrivers, rewarding early discovery of valuable data sources. When Curators withdraw their stake, they receive GRT based on the current bonding curve position, which may be higher or lower than their initial stake depending on how curation interest has evolved. This creates strong incentives for careful evaluation and early identification of valuable subgraphs.
2.2 Economic Sustainability and Revenue Models
The Graph's long-term economic sustainability depends on query fee revenue eventually exceeding the costs of network operation and providing attractive returns to infrastructure providers. This transition from inflation-subsidized operation to fee-sustained economics represents a critical milestone for protocol maturity.
Current query volumes generate substantial activity—billions of queries monthly—but fees remain relatively low as the protocol prioritizes adoption over revenue maximization. The economic model assumes that as blockchain adoption grows and more applications depend on indexed data, query volumes will increase dramatically while per-query costs decrease through improved efficiency. This creates a scalability path where total revenue grows faster than costs.
The fee structure balances accessibility with sustainable operation. Applications pay fees based on their query volume and complexity, with rates set through market mechanisms where Indexers compete to serve queries efficiently. Large applications with millions of daily users pay substantially more than small projects with limited usage, creating natural price discrimination that makes infrastructure accessible to all developers while generating sufficient revenue from high-volume users.
Future economic sustainability also depends on efficiency improvements across the network. As indexing technology matures, the computational and storage costs of maintaining subgraphs should decline. Competition among Indexers will drive operational efficiency as margins compress. Enhanced caching and query optimization can serve more requests with the same infrastructure. These trends should enable the network to serve exponentially more queries without proportionally increasing costs.
Please share your thoughts in the comments! Do you think infrastructure protocols can sustainably operate on transaction fees, or will they always require token inflation?
3. The Subgraph Ecosystem and Developer Adoption
The Graph's success ultimately depends on developer adoption—whether thousands of blockchain applications choose to build on The Graph rather than alternatives. The subgraph ecosystem has grown remarkably since launch, with thousands of subgraphs deployed covering diverse use cases across multiple blockchain networks.
The diversity of subgraphs reflects blockchain's expanding scope. DeFi protocols use subgraphs to track liquidity pools, trading volumes, user positions, and protocol metrics. NFT marketplaces query indexed data about collections, owners, transaction history, and rarity attributes. DAOs use subgraphs to monitor governance proposals, voting participation, and treasury operations. Analytics platforms aggregate data across protocols to provide insights about ecosystem trends and user behavior.
Major projects' dependence on The Graph demonstrates its mission-critical status. Uniswap's interface queries The Graph for pool information, historical prices, and trading volumes. Aave uses subgraphs to display lending markets, interest rates, and user positions. Decentraland queries property ownership and marketplace activity. These aren't peripheral features—they're core functionalities that would require substantial custom infrastructure if The Graph didn't exist.
3.1 Developer Experience and Tooling
The Graph prioritizes exceptional developer experience, recognizing that infrastructure adoption depends on making integration as frictionless as possible. The protocol provides comprehensive tooling, documentation, and support that enables developers to deploy subgraphs without blockchain infrastructure expertise.
Key developer tools include:
- Graph CLI providing command-line interface for subgraph creation, testing, and deployment
- Subgraph Studio offering visual interface for development and deployment management
- Documentation portal with tutorials, guides, and reference materials covering all aspects
- Graph Explorer allowing discovery of existing subgraphs and their usage statistics
- Testing framework enabling local subgraph testing before mainnet deployment
- Monitoring tools providing visibility into indexing status and query performance
The development workflow is designed to be intuitive even for developers new to blockchain infrastructure. Creating a subgraph starts with defining the data schema—what entities exist and their relationships. Then developers write mapping functions that transform blockchain events into these entities. The Graph's tooling handles the complex infrastructure work—monitoring blockchains, processing events, maintaining databases, and serving queries.
This abstraction of complexity makes blockchain data accessible to mainstream developers who might be intimidated by running nodes, managing databases, or understanding blockchain internals. A web developer comfortable with GraphQL can create a subgraph in hours rather than spending weeks building custom indexing infrastructure. This accessibility has been crucial to The Graph's widespread adoption.
3.2 Multi-Chain Expansion and Interoperability
The Graph initially launched supporting only Ethereum but has rapidly expanded to index multiple blockchain networks, recognizing that Web3's future is multi-chain. This expansion makes The Graph the unified data layer across diverse blockchain ecosystems, positioning it as essential infrastructure regardless of which specific chains dominate.
Currently supported networks include Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche, Celo, Fantom, Moonbeam, and others, with additional chains continuously added. This multi-chain support creates powerful network effects—developers building cross-chain applications can use The Graph as unified data infrastructure rather than integrating different solutions for each chain.
The technical challenges of multi-chain indexing are substantial. Different blockchains have varying data structures, consensus mechanisms, and finality characteristics. Some chains produce blocks every few seconds while others take minutes. Smart contract languages and event formats differ across platforms. The Graph's infrastructure must accommodate these differences while presenting consistent querying interfaces.
Supporting diverse chains also creates opportunities for cross-chain data analysis that wasn't previously possible. Subgraphs can aggregate data across multiple chains to provide holistic views of protocols operating on several networks. For example, a DeFi protocol deployed on both Ethereum and Polygon can maintain a single subgraph that combines data from both chains, enabling accurate total metrics and cross-chain analytics.
Which matters more to you in infrastructure protocols—support for many blockchains or deep optimization for specific chains?
4. Decentralization Journey and Network Evolution
The Graph's path to full decentralization represents one of blockchain infrastructure's most carefully managed transitions. Rather than launching immediately as a fully decentralized network (which could have resulted in chaos and poor service quality), The Graph followed a phased approach that gradually transferred control from centralized hosted service to decentralized protocol.
The initial phase relied on The Graph's hosted service—a centralized infrastructure operated by the core team that provided reliable indexing and querying while the decentralized protocol was being developed and tested. This pragmatic approach allowed thousands of applications to depend on The Graph's infrastructure while ensuring service quality during the critical early adoption period. The hosted service demonstrated product-market fit before betting everything on decentralized operations.
The transition to decentralization began with the mainnet launch in December 2020, which activated the decentralized protocol alongside the continued operation of the hosted service. This allowed gradual migration where subgraphs could move from hosted service to decentralized network as Indexers built capacity and developers gained confidence in decentralized operation. The parallel operation reduced risk and allowed learning from real-world operations.
4.1 Current State and Ongoing Development
The decentralized network has matured substantially since launch, though complete transition from hosted service remains ongoing. Hundreds of Indexers now operate infrastructure across multiple continents, providing redundancy and geographic distribution. Query volumes on the decentralized network have grown dramatically, demonstrating that decentralized infrastructure can serve production applications at scale.
Key milestones in The Graph's decentralization include:
- Mainnet launch activating GRT token and core protocol functionality
- Transfer tools enabling subgraph migration from hosted service to decentralized network
- Multi-chain expansion bringing decentralized indexing to networks beyond Ethereum
- L2 integration deploying protocol components on Arbitrum for improved efficiency
- Governance activation enabling GRT holders to influence protocol evolution
- Indexer professionalization as infrastructure operation becomes established business
The protocol continues evolving with significant development efforts focused on improving performance, reducing costs, and enhancing functionality. Ongoing work includes optimizing indexing efficiency, reducing storage requirements, improving query routing, and developing new features that expand what's possible with indexed blockchain data.
The migration from hosted service to decentralized network represents a delicate balancing act. Moving too quickly could disrupt applications depending on stable infrastructure. Moving too slowly undermines the decentralization mission and exposes the protocol to centralization risks. The Graph's team has navigated this carefully, setting timelines for hosted service sunset while ensuring decentralized alternatives are ready.
4.2 Governance and Protocol Evolution
The Graph employs decentralized governance where GRT holders influence protocol development through a structured governance process. This ensures the protocol evolves according to community preferences rather than being dictated by any central authority, though the sophistication required for effective protocol governance remains an ongoing challenge.
The governance process includes several stages designed to balance open participation with informed decision-making. Informal discussions occur in community forums where anyone can propose ideas and gather feedback. Formal proposals meeting certain requirements progress to snapshot voting where GRT holders signal support or opposition. Successful proposals then move to on-chain implementation through protocol upgrades.
Key governance decisions include:
- Protocol parameter adjustments modifying economic incentives and operational parameters
- Treasury allocation directing ecosystem funds toward valuable development and growth initiatives
- Feature prioritization influencing what capabilities are developed next
- Multi-chain expansion determining which blockchains to support and resource allocation
- Economic policy adjusting inflation rates and reward distribution mechanisms
Effective governance requires balancing multiple stakeholder interests—Indexers want parameters favoring infrastructure profitability, Delegators seek maximum rewards, Curators want sustainable curation economics, developers need reliable infrastructure, and token holders desire long-term value appreciation. Finding equilibria that satisfy all groups while advancing protocol goals represents ongoing governance challenges.
If this article was helpful, please share it! What do you think is the biggest challenge in decentralized protocol governance—technical complexity or coordinating diverse interests?
5. Competitive Landscape and Strategic Positioning
The Graph operates in an increasingly competitive blockchain infrastructure market where numerous projects vie to provide data indexing and querying services. Understanding The Graph's competitive position illuminates both its advantages and challenges in maintaining market leadership.
Direct competitors include centralized services like Alchemy and Infura that offer indexed blockchain data alongside node infrastructure. These services provide excellent reliability and developer experience but sacrifice decentralization—they can be shut down by authorities, implement censorship, or change pricing unilaterally. The Graph's decentralization provides censorship resistance and credible neutrality that centralized alternatives cannot match.
Other decentralized alternatives include protocol-specific solutions and emerging competitors attempting to replicate The Graph's model. Some blockchains build native indexing into their infrastructure, though this limits flexibility and creates fragmentation. New projects promise better performance or economics, though The Graph's network effects and established ecosystem create substantial competitive moats.
The Graph's strategic advantages include:
- Network effects from thousands of subgraphs and applications creating valuable data ecosystem
- Multi-chain support positioning The Graph as unified infrastructure across diverse blockchains
- Decentralization credibility with hundreds of independent Indexers providing genuine decentralization
- Developer mindshare as The Graph becomes the default choice for blockchain data infrastructure
- Proven reliability serving billions of queries monthly for production applications
- Continuous innovation with active development improving capabilities and efficiency
However, significant challenges exist. The protocol's complexity can be intimidating to newcomers compared to simpler centralized alternatives. Economic sustainability remains unproven as inflation currently subsidizes most Indexer revenue. Competition from well-funded centralized services with superior marketing and business development creates pressure. The hosted service migration creates transition uncertainty for developers.
5.1 Future Vision and Strategic Direction
The Graph's long-term vision extends beyond simply indexing blockchain data to becoming the decentralized query layer for all of Web3. This ambitious goal involves several strategic initiatives that could dramatically expand The Graph's scope and importance.
The roadmap includes supporting increasingly complex queries and data transformations. Current subgraphs primarily provide relatively straightforward data retrieval. Future capabilities might include complex analytics, cross-subgraph queries, machine learning on indexed data, and real-time data streams. These enhanced capabilities would make The Graph indispensable for sophisticated applications requiring advanced data infrastructure.
Another strategic direction involves data availability beyond blockchains. The same indexing and querying infrastructure that works for blockchain data could theoretically index decentralized storage systems like IPFS, Arweave, or Filecoin. This would position The Graph as the query layer for all decentralized data, not just blockchain transactions. The technical challenges are substantial but the potential market opportunity is enormous.
Integration with layer 2 solutions and scalability improvements represent crucial near-term priorities. Deploying protocol components on Arbitrum and other L2s reduces transaction costs and improves efficiency. Enhanced indexing technology can process more data with less infrastructure. Better query routing ensures requests reach the most efficient Indexers. These improvements are essential for scaling to serve exponentially growing Web3 adoption.
The protocol also explores how artificial intelligence and machine learning could enhance indexed data. Imagine subgraphs that don't just store raw blockchain data but provide intelligent insights—identifying trading patterns, predicting protocol behavior, or detecting anomalies. This could transform The Graph from passive data infrastructure to active intelligence layer providing actionable insights alongside raw data access.
6. Real-World Impact and Use Cases
The Graph's impact extends far beyond abstract infrastructure—it enables thousands of applications that millions of users interact with daily, often without realizing The Graph powers their experience. Examining specific use cases illustrates the protocol's practical importance.
DeFi applications represent The Graph's largest use case category. Decentralized exchanges query The Graph for real-time liquidity, historical prices, and trading volumes. Without this indexed data, DEX interfaces would struggle to display the information traders need to make informed decisions. Lending protocols use The Graph to show available liquidity, interest rates, and user positions. Yield aggregators query data across multiple protocols to identify optimal farming strategies. The Graph makes DeFi functionally possible at scale.
NFT marketplaces depend heavily on indexed data for core functionality. Displaying collections requires querying ownership records across thousands of tokens. Showing price history and trading volume involves aggregating transaction data. Implementing search and filtering needs efficient queries across multiple attributes. Without The Graph, NFT marketplaces would require massive custom infrastructure making the business model economically challenging.
Analytics and data visualization platforms demonstrate The Graph's power for understanding blockchain ecosystems. Projects like Dune Analytics, Nansen, and numerous others query The Graph to aggregate data across protocols, track ecosystem trends, and provide insights about user behavior. These analytics are crucial for investors, developers, and researchers trying to understand what's actually happening in rapidly evolving blockchain markets.
Gaming and metaverse applications leverage The Graph for tracking in-game assets, player statistics, and virtual world state. As blockchain gaming grows beyond simple speculation to genuine virtual economies, indexed data becomes essential infrastructure. Players need to see their inventory, track their earnings, and understand game economics. Developers need analytics about player behavior and economic balance. The Graph provides the data layer making these experiences possible.
In conclusion, The Graph represents essential infrastructure for Web3's continued growth, solving the fundamental challenge of making blockchain data accessible and queryable through a decentralized protocol. By creating a multi-sided marketplace where Indexers operate infrastructure, Curators signal quality, Delegators provide capital, and developers deploy subgraphs defining data needs, The Graph achieves decentralization while maintaining the service quality and reliability that production applications demand. The protocol's impact is demonstrated through thousands of dependent applications including major DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces, analytics platforms, and gaming projects that collectively serve millions of users daily. The GRT token coordinates network incentives, ensuring infrastructure providers are rewarded for reliable operation while maintaining censorship resistance and credible neutrality that centralized alternatives cannot match. Though challenges remain in completing the migration from hosted service to fully decentralized operation and achieving economic sustainability through query fee revenue rather than token inflation, The Graph's multi-chain expansion, continuous technical innovation, and established network effects position it as the likely winner in decentralized blockchain data infrastructure. As Web3 evolves beyond purely financial applications toward mainstream consumer experiences requiring instant access to complex blockchain data, infrastructure like The Graph that makes this data accessible through simple APIs while maintaining decentralization principles will become increasingly critical, cementing The Graph's role as the query layer upon which the decentralized internet is built.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q1. What problem does The Graph solve?
The Graph solves blockchain's data accessibility problem by providing decentralized indexing and querying infrastructure. Blockchains are optimized for writing transactions, not reading historical data or answering complex queries. The Graph's protocol allows efficient data access through subgraphs—organized APIs that index specific blockchain data and make it queryable through GraphQL, eliminating the need for applications to build custom infrastructure.
Q2. How does The Graph's decentralized network work?
The Graph operates through multiple participant roles coordinated by economic incentives: Indexers run infrastructure to index blockchains and serve queries, earning fees and rewards; Curators stake GRT on valuable subgraphs to signal quality; Delegators stake with Indexers to earn rewards without running infrastructure; Developers create subgraphs defining what data to index; Consumers query data through applications, paying fees distributed to infrastructure providers.
Q3. What is the GRT token used for?
GRT serves multiple functions including Indexer staking as collateral ensuring service quality, Curator signaling on valuable subgraphs, Delegator participation in rewards, query fee payments, and protocol governance. The token coordinates network incentives, aligning all participants toward providing reliable, decentralized data infrastructure. Total supply follows inflation schedule providing ongoing rewards while trending toward fee-based sustainability.
Q4. What applications depend on The Graph?
Thousands of applications use The Graph including major DeFi protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and Curve for displaying liquidity and trading data; NFT marketplaces querying ownership and transaction history; analytics platforms aggregating ecosystem data; gaming and metaverse applications tracking assets and player statistics. The Graph processes billions of queries monthly, making it one of blockchain's most heavily used infrastructure protocols.
Q5. How does The Graph compare to centralized alternatives?
Centralized services like Alchemy and Infura offer excellent reliability and developer experience but can be shut down, implement censorship, or change pricing unilaterally. The Graph provides similar functionality through decentralized infrastructure with hundreds of independent Indexers, ensuring censorship resistance, credible neutrality, and permanent availability. The trade-off is greater complexity and ongoing transition from hosted service to fully decentralized operation.
We've covered everything about The Graph (GRT) Blockchain Data Indexing: The Future of Decentralized Information Infrastructure. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to leave a comment below.
